Public Records and Accountability
The Resident Runaround Review
When government sends you somewhere else, what happens next? The Resident Runaround Review examines public records to see what offices can show about resident questions, referrals, and follow-through.
Paid for by Residents for Jacob Schulz
The Framework
Four Questions
Records requests were submitted to government offices to help answer four basic questions about what happens when residents ask for help:
- Why do residents contact the office?
- What does the office do next?
- Where are residents referred, and why?
- What happens after the handoff?
The Review does not assume that a referral solved the problem. It asks whether the office's records can show what happened after the handoff.
The Key
How to Read the Results
Every office is reviewed using the same six status categories.
The office produced records that address the question. This does not necessarily mean the records are complete or that every resident contact is included.
The office produced some relevant information, but the records do not fully answer the question.
The office stated that it had no records responsive to that part of the request. This describes the office's response; it does not prove that the information exists nowhere in government.
The office has not yet provided its final response, or the response is still being reviewed.
The materials produced do not answer the question, and the office has not clearly stated that no responsive records exist.
A response has been received, but part of the request has been narrowed, clarified, supplemented, or remains under active follow-up before a final finding can be made.
Results at a Glance
How Offices Compare
18 offices are part of the core four-question Review. Here is where things stand.
Produced Records
At least partial production received
Follow-Up Pending
Response received; portion of request still active
Responses Pending
Still searching, extended, or ongoing
No Responsive Records
Office reported no records responsive to the request
Compare Offices at a Glance
See what each office's records can show across the four questions used in the Resident Runaround Review.
| Office | Why Residents Contact | What the Office Did | Where Residents Are Sent | After the Handoff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| City Clerk of Chicago | No Responsive Records | No Responsive Records | No Responsive Records | No Responsive Records |
| Chicago 311 | Produced | No Responsive Records | No Responsive Records | Partial |
| DFSS | No Responsive Records | No Responsive Records | No Responsive Records | No Responsive Records |
| CDPH | Produced | Produced | Partial | Unclear |
| Chicago Housing Authority | Response Pending | Response Pending | Response Pending | Response Pending |
| Mayor's Office | No Responsive Records | No Responsive Records | Partial | No Responsive Records |
| BACP | Pending — Extended | Pending — Extended | Pending — Extended | Pending — Extended |
| City Treasurer | Pending — Extended | Pending — Extended | Pending — Extended | Pending — Extended |
| Cook County Clerk | Partial | Partial | Partial | Unclear |
| Cook County Treasurer | Produced | Partial | Partial | Unclear |
| Cook County Board President | No Responsive Records | No Responsive Records | No Responsive Records | No Responsive Records |
| IL Comptroller | Produced | Produced | Partial | Unclear |
| Dept. on Aging | Produced | Produced | Partial | Unclear |
| IDHS | No Responsive Records | No Responsive Records | No Responsive Records | No Responsive Records |
| IDPH | No Responsive Records | No Responsive Records | No Responsive Records | No Responsive Records |
| IHDA | Partial | No Responsive Records | No Responsive Records | Unclear |
| IL Governor's Office | Response Pending | Response Pending | Response Pending | Response Pending |
| IL State Treasurer | No Responsive Records | No Responsive Records | No Responsive Records | No Responsive Records |
The matrix shows what the records allow us to see. It is not a rating of an office or its employees.
Core Four-Question Review
These offices are part of the Review's core four-question comparison examining why residents contact government, what the office does, where residents are sent, and what can be seen after the handoff.
Additional agencies and records requests are examined separately under Special Reviews.
Produced Records
Cook County Clerk's Office
Office of the Cook County Treasurer
Illinois Department on Aging
Responses Still Pending
Illinois Office of the Governor
Chicago Housing Authority
Office of the City Treasurer of Chicago
Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection
Follow-Up Pending
Chicago 311 City Services
Chicago Department of Family and Support Services
Chicago Department of Public Health
City of Chicago Office of the Mayor
Illinois Office of Comptroller
Illinois Department of Public Health
Illinois Housing Development Authority
No Responsive Records
Office of the President of the Cook County Board of Commissioners
No Responsive RecordsOffice of the Illinois State Treasurer
No Responsive RecordsOffice of the City Clerk of Chicago
No Responsive RecordsIllinois Department of Human Services
No Responsive RecordsMethodology
What the Review Can — and Cannot — Tell Us
The Review can show what records an office produced, what those records measure, and which questions remain unanswered.
It cannot prove everything that happens inside an office. A record that was not produced may exist elsewhere, may be maintained in another form, or may not exist at all. Different offices also use different systems, definitions, and reporting periods.
For that reason, each finding should distinguish between what the records show, what the office said, and what remains unknown.
Updates
Latest Updates
Chicago 311 produced aggregate call performance reports for 2024, 2025, and January 1 through September 25, 2026, along with a report listing the five leading categories under '311IOC' and 'Service Request' for each reporting year. The records document incoming calls, answered calls, abandoned calls, answer speed, and leading contact categories. The supplied reports do not establish how repeat contacts about the same issue are linked, whether referrals reach their destination, or whether residents obtain the information or service they need.
View Chicago 311 entry →Response pending. CHA stated it would be in touch on September 30, 2026. Next contact expected: September 30, 2026.
View CHA entry →IDHS reported that it had no aggregate reports or summary records responsive to the request about processing barriers, referrals, and customer-service performance. The department stated its FOIA team consulted multiple bureaus and offices within the Division of Family and Community Services. The response does not establish whether individual programs, other divisions, or contractor-operated systems maintain relevant records. FOIA Reference: 26-FTS-9561.
View IDHS entry →The Office of the City Clerk responded on October 1, 2026, reporting no responsive records. The Office stated it does not maintain the types of aggregate reporting requested concerning resident inquiry patterns, transfers, repeat contacts and outcomes, or recurring service issues identified by frontline employees. FOIA Request F153078-091826.
View City Clerk special review →Response pending. As of September 25, 2026, the office stated it needed "a few more days." No specific date provided. FOIA Request #2026-654.
View Governor's Office entry →IDPH issued an amended response stating it had no responsive records beyond previously identified complaint reports and public healthcare-facility complaint information. The amended response describes an early-stage Director's Office initiative to track customer-service issues that had not yet begun tracking.
View IDPH entry →The Secretary of State released agreements and supporting documents describing the Chicago City Clerk's access to driver and vehicle information. The remaining question is when that access can satisfy city sticker purchase requirements without residents supplying registration documents.
View city sticker verification review →The Mayor's Office provided its Front Desk Procedures guide, documenting how staff receive calls and route constituent inquiries. The office reported no responsive records for the remainder of the request, including the requested aggregate reports and outcome measures.
View Mayor's Office detail →Response pending. In a September 24, 2026 letter, the City Treasurer's Office extended its response time by five business days, citing operational burden, and stated it would respond by October 2, 2026. Agency-stated response date: October 2, 2026.
View pending responses →The Department of Administrative Hearings responded to request H153068-091826, directing the requester to the Municipal Code without identifying a specific section, reporting no responsive records for judge guidance or policy materials, and supplying a spreadsheet of aggregate adjudication data not yet analyzed for this review.
View temporary parking sign review →The Comptroller provided a 2024 Chicago front-desk report and a March–September 2026 call-queue dashboard documenting call activity and handling measures. Referral destinations are listed but counts and outcomes are not provided. The 2024 annual and monthly call totals require clarification.
View Comptroller source documents →DFSS responded to the core four-question records request. DFSS said it does not maintain responsive aggregate records for any of the requested inquiry, referral, performance, and navigation measures. The senior-services portion was denied as unduly burdensome, and a narrowed follow-up request is now pending.
View DFSS detail →DSS reported no responsive records for a request concerning snow and ice operating practices during the 2009-2010 and 2014-2015 winter seasons, citing its records retention policy. DSS also requested a five-business-day extension on a separate request received September 18, 2026, stating that additional search efforts are underway.
View Snow Operations review →IHDA responded on September 29, 2026, providing written inspection procedures and aggregate inspection totals for 2020 and 2025. IHDA reported 421 inspections in 2025 and 26 in 2020. Records supporting totals for 2011 and 2015 were not readily identified. IHDA stated it does not maintain a breakdown of inspections scheduled, cancelled, rescheduled, or not completed as planned. FOIA request 2026-196.
View IHDA housing inspection review →BACP requested a five-business-day extension on the business licensing records request, citing the volume of records, the need for an extensive search, and the need for qualified review for possible exemptions or redactions.
View BACP detail →Supplemental correspondence received from the Cook County Clerk's Office. The email clarified the scope of records maintained across departments, including Recording Operations, Help Desk, and Fraud Unit.
View source documents →Initial workbook received as partial production. Records include call wrap-up reasons, call-center queue data, and outbound transfer counts for January 2024 through September 14, 2026.
View source documents →Response received. The Treasurer stated it did not have records responsive to the request.
View finding →Seven offices asked for five more business days to respond. Responses are expected on or before September 25, 2026.
View pending responses →Can Government See the Whole Journey?
Good service requires more than answering one call or forwarding one message. Government should be able to understand where residents get stuck, whether the same problems keep happening, and what occurs after someone is sent elsewhere.
The records come first. Partial answers stay partial. Unknowns remain visible. Corrections will be published when new information changes an earlier finding.
Have you experienced the runaround?
If you have been transferred between offices, asked to re-explain your situation, or never heard back after a referral, your experience is part of what this review is documenting. Share it or get involved with the campaign.